richard wasserstrom arguments on preferential treatment

It is a vivid illustration of the contribution philosophy can make to the clarification and solution of some of the crucial social issues of our time. Yet it differs from much much philosophy within the analytic tradition in avoiding the use of esoteric or technical vocabulary and by its turning from matters of conceptual analysis to issues of justification and the examination of specific, less general kids of arguments, some of which lie in academic areas beyond the conventional domain of philosophy. Arguments for and against of preferential treatment There are various parameters or positions based on which preferential treatment as witnessing in India at present can be evaluated.

Wasserstrom's writing, with its concern for the justifiability of distinct social practices, laws, and institutions, is an example of the kind of philosophical inquiry that is a part of the expanded corpus of Anglo-American analytic philosophy. According to this position, preferential treatment is morally and ethically obligatory owing to rectify past discrimination or unfairness.

of Preferential Treatment (Richard Wasserstrom):Primary Argument:Secondary. The focus throughout is on the statement and critical examination of substantive moral arguments which may be brought to bear upon each topic. We should strive for human development virtues (sub-argument within.

Prominent philosopher & legal scholar Richard Wasserstrom here presents a clear and incisive examination of five social issues which are of major importance in contemporary American life: 149, noting that the contagion argument assumes publicity of the crime, but often offenses are not made public. As Richard Wasserstrom tells us in an important article that is still relevant today, (1) racism and sexism are harmful to the life prospects of many.

Richard wasserstrom arguments on preferential treatment